The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly condemned an incident at the Federal High Court in Abuja where a judge reportedly ordered a lawyer to kneel during proceedings, calling the action unlawful and contrary to established judicial standards.
NBA President, Afam Osigwe (SAN), in a statement on Tuesday, expressed concern over reports that Justice Mohammed Umar instructed Marshall Abubakar, lead defence counsel for activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore, to kneel during a court session.
The directive reportedly followed a disagreement over the scheduling of a hearing date, during which the lawyer allegedly raised his voice while addressing the court.
Describing the development as “extremely serious,” Osigwe emphasized the implications for the dignity of the legal profession and the integrity of the judiciary.
Related News:
Senate Acted Within the Law in Natasha’s Suspension – Appeal Court Rules
Rivers Chief Judge Rejects Panel Against Governor Fubara, Deputy
Fubara directs lawyers to appeal judgement
“The courtroom is a temple of justice, governed by law, procedure, and decorum,” he said. “Judges’ authority to maintain order must always be exercised within the bounds of the law.”
The NBA clarified that while courts have powers to punish for contempt, these powers are limited by due process and cannot be applied arbitrarily. “Ordering a lawyer or anyone to kneel in court is not a recognised judicial sanction under Nigerian law,” Osigwe stated.
He further stressed that the dignity of the court must be reflected not only in rulings but also in the way judicial authority is exercised.
The NBA also reminded lawyers of their duty to maintain professionalism and respect in court proceedings.
“The legal profession thrives on mutual respect between the Bar and the Bench,” Osigwe said.
“Lawyers must advocate firmly but always with courtesy and decorum. Any grievances arising in court should be addressed through proper institutional and disciplinary channels.”
The NBA called for calm among all stakeholders and assured that it would engage relevant authorities to ensure the rule of law and judicial ethics are upheld.
About the Author
